Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20801 - 20810 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 20801 - 20810 of 63981 for records/1000.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
). As to an agency’s findings of fact, we will affirm them if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13492 - 2005-03-31
). As to an agency’s findings of fact, we will affirm them if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13492 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Laura E.B. v. Robert M.C.
process whereby the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and are considered together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12762 - 2017-09-21
process whereby the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and are considered together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12762 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the original order set the expiration date at one year after the hearing, but no records indicate that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43565 - 2009-11-17
on the original order set the expiration date at one year after the hearing, but no records indicate that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43565 - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
no basis in the record to conclude that the department’s motion to dismiss was either untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
no basis in the record to conclude that the department’s motion to dismiss was either untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Terri L.
in finding that the fourth condition had not been satisfied. They cite evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12313 - 2017-09-21
in finding that the fourth condition had not been satisfied. They cite evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12313 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel N.P.
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16181 - 2017-09-21
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16181 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel N.P.
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16180 - 2017-09-21
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190457 - 2017-09-21
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190457 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, but that letter is not included in the record. The record does include the chief judge’s response, which stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26779 - 2006-10-11
, but that letter is not included in the record. The record does include the chief judge’s response, which stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26779 - 2006-10-11