Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20811 - 20820 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20811 - 20820 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 228 Wis. 2d 707, 717, 599 N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51336 - 2010-06-23
we review de novo. Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 228 Wis. 2d 707, 717, 599 N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51336 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
Habermehl Electric, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
an interpretation of a statute, we review that legal issue de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5347 - 2017-09-19
an interpretation of a statute, we review that legal issue de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5347 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113969 - 2017-09-21
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113969 - 2017-09-21
Theresa Ann Bushelman v. William Henry Bushelman
of statutory construction, an issue of law which we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2369 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction, an issue of law which we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
Western Wisconsin Water, Inc. v. Quality Beverages of Wisconsin, Inc.
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7174 - 2005-03-31
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7174 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 200
“We review an order for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26469 - 2006-10-30
“We review an order for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26469 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 26
was not void and unenforceable under § 704.44(10) and § ATCP 134.08(10). ¶7 Marquardt sought a trial de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792236 - 2024-06-20
was not void and unenforceable under § 704.44(10) and § ATCP 134.08(10). ¶7 Marquardt sought a trial de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792236 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
information is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. ¶43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074361 - 2026-02-11
information is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. ¶43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074361 - 2026-02-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
the applicable statutes de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42, 320 Wis. 2d 76, 768 N.W.2d 798
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52407 - 2014-09-15
the applicable statutes de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42, 320 Wis. 2d 76, 768 N.W.2d 798
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52407 - 2014-09-15