Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 98407 for court records search online.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 98407 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 13, 2022 Sheila T.3 Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543038 - 2022-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 13, 2022 Sheila T.3 Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543038 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968203 - 2025-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968203 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 4, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241583 - 2019-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 4, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241583 - 2019-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be No. 2025AP2668 8 circumvented by either the court or the State asserting that based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104326 - 2026-04-10
be No. 2025AP2668 8 circumvented by either the court or the State asserting that based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104326 - 2026-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 11, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677505 - 2023-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 11, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677505 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the “sexual gratification” element. Rumsey is wrong. The record clearly indicates that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629447 - 2023-03-07
the “sexual gratification” element. Rumsey is wrong. The record clearly indicates that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629447 - 2023-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a consent judgment is merely a contract acknowledged in open court and ordered to be recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808056 - 2024-06-05
, a consent judgment is merely a contract acknowledged in open court and ordered to be recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808056 - 2024-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 4, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175577 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 4, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236315 - 2019-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236315 - 2019-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162154 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162154 - 2017-09-21

