Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 29832 for des.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
Gloria Coston v. Joseph P.
of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis.2d 520
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12410 - 2014-09-15
of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis.2d 520
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Deborah C. Westbury
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1, 3 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13427 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1, 3 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13427 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 41
and a No. 2013AP1205 10 determination of substantive arbitrability, questions of law we review de novo.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109323 - 2017-09-21
and a No. 2013AP1205 10 determination of substantive arbitrability, questions of law we review de novo.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109323 - 2017-09-21
Germaine Schoenhofen v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
] because statutory revisions limited the issues that could be raised in a trial de novo in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15230 - 2005-03-31
] because statutory revisions limited the issues that could be raised in a trial de novo in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15230 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 111
disability benefits and arrears from November 2001, Glen filed a motion for a de novo hearing. Glen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86691 - 2014-09-15
disability benefits and arrears from November 2001, Glen filed a motion for a de novo hearing. Glen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86691 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John D. Hess v. Juan Fernandez III, M.D.
therefore review the decision of the circuit court de novo, although benefiting from its analysis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16720 - 2017-09-21
therefore review the decision of the circuit court de novo, although benefiting from its analysis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16720 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81533 - 2012-04-25
or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81533 - 2012-04-25
[PDF]
Troy M. Hellenbrand v. Franklin C. Hilliard
judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6013 - 2017-09-19
judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6013 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59109 - 2011-02-22
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59109 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
WI 20
interpretation this court reviews de novo. See St. Croix Cnty. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs. v. Michael D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964973 - 2025-06-03
interpretation this court reviews de novo. See St. Croix Cnty. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs. v. Michael D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964973 - 2025-06-03