Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 28812 for f.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 28812 for f.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1178 (2d Cir. 1981). As such, a prosecutor wields substantial persuasive force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40935 - 2009-09-14
. Modica, 663 F.2d 1173, 1178 (2d Cir. 1981). As such, a prosecutor wields substantial persuasive force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40935 - 2009-09-14
Colleen Seefeldt v. Darold Seefeldt
-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: RAYMOND F. THUMS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11901 - 2005-03-31
-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: RAYMOND F. THUMS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11901 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
from the child. (f) Whether the child will be able to enter into a more stable and permanent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31
from the child. (f) Whether the child will be able to enter into a more stable and permanent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32(1)(f). Upon review of the records and supplemental materials, we agree with appellate counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04
809.32(1)(f). Upon review of the records and supplemental materials, we agree with appellate counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Darian L. Hall
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-1381-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12476 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-1381-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12476 - 2017-09-21
Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments
in Armour that “[i]f a landlord withholds amounts that do not represent an allowable claim under [provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13339 - 2005-03-31
in Armour that “[i]f a landlord withholds amounts that do not represent an allowable claim under [provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13339 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Equinees A. Boyles
), including the adequacy of representation by trial counsel. See Smith v. Estelle, 711 F.2d 677, 682 (5th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10334 - 2017-09-20
), including the adequacy of representation by trial counsel. See Smith v. Estelle, 711 F.2d 677, 682 (5th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10334 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
v. Branker, 506 F.3d 358 369 (4th Cir. 2007). The State concedes that no Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39049 - 2014-09-15
v. Branker, 506 F.3d 358 369 (4th Cir. 2007). The State concedes that no Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of is true.” See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f) (permitting counsel to rebut allegations made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178726 - 2017-09-21
of is true.” See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f) (permitting counsel to rebut allegations made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
of information, see United States v. Martin, 615 F.2d 318, 329 (5th Cir. 1980) ("It is possible that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
of information, see United States v. Martin, 615 F.2d 318, 329 (5th Cir. 1980) ("It is possible that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19