Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 20821 - 20830 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Sherard D. Jenkins
some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence ….’” State v. Thompson, 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25294 - 2006-05-30
some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence ….’” State v. Thompson, 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25294 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071608 - 2026-02-04
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071608 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the record. The record does include the chief judge’s response, which stated that the assigned judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26779 - 2014-09-15
in the record. The record does include the chief judge’s response, which stated that the assigned judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
remains in dispute. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810188 - 2024-06-12
remains in dispute. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810188 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP962-CRNM 2 the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834666 - 2024-08-06
. No. 2023AP962-CRNM 2 the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834666 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and unsupported by the record. Specifically, he contends that the trial court failed to explain why his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
and unsupported by the record. Specifically, he contends that the trial court failed to explain why his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
CA Blank Order
] Thereafter, upon our independent review of the supplemental no-merit report and the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
] Thereafter, upon our independent review of the supplemental no-merit report and the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2013AP1384 6 found zero support in the award or the record 3 for the MPA’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106319 - 2017-09-21
No. 2013AP1384 6 found zero support in the award or the record 3 for the MPA’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106319 - 2017-09-21
Lake States, Inc. v. Harjeet Singh Walia
presented warrants vacatur. See Wis. Stat. §§ 788.10(1)(c) & (d). After reading the record, we must reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15405 - 2008-04-14
presented warrants vacatur. See Wis. Stat. §§ 788.10(1)(c) & (d). After reading the record, we must reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15405 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Elaine Veasley
and the record, this court concludes that probable cause to arrest all four occupants existed and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
and the record, this court concludes that probable cause to arrest all four occupants existed and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19