Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20831 - 20840 of 58507 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
Minniecheske and others (hereinafter “Minniecheske”) appeal a trial court order that denied their § 806.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13474 - 2017-09-21

State v. Delavago K. Moore
of the trial court, and a strong policy exists against appellate interference with the discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21524 - 2006-02-27

State v. John Moldenhauer
postconviction relief. Just before trial, Moldenhauer pleaded no contest to the two charges. In exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9661 - 2005-03-31

State v. James A. Bever
assault of a child and sexual exploitation of a child, both as a party to the crime, after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15801 - 2005-03-31

State v. Darwin D. Hoye
documentation; (5) the trial court erred in accepting the State’s version of events and imposing the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3653 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tanya M. Luchinski
disposition. ¶3 The State asked the trial court to withhold sentence and place Luchinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15637 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Peter N. Peterson v. YMCA of Metropolitan Madison, Inc.
. The trial court concluded there was no evidence of negligence, noting that Peterson had given the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14420 - 2014-09-15

State v. Claude A. Gast
.[1] The trial court denied the motion on both procedural and substantive grounds. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7082 - 2005-03-31

Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
(hereinafter “Minniecheske”) appeal a trial court order that denied their § 806.07, Stats., motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13474 - 2005-03-31

Peter N. Peterson v. YMCA of Metropolitan Madison, Inc.
opposed the YMCA’s motion for summary judgment but submitted no expert testimony. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14420 - 2005-03-31