Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20841 - 20850 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 20841 - 20850 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
‘colorable’ claim suggested by a client.” Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 754 (1983). “[I]t is still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121180 - 2014-09-08
‘colorable’ claim suggested by a client.” Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 754 (1983). “[I]t is still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121180 - 2014-09-08
State v. Hung Nam Tran
the deportation consequences. ¶3 When a defendant claims that notice of possible deportation was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15915 - 2005-03-31
the deportation consequences. ¶3 When a defendant claims that notice of possible deportation was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15915 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The report next addresses Lubbert’s claim to appellate counsel that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137860 - 2015-03-24
535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The report next addresses Lubbert’s claim to appellate counsel that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137860 - 2015-03-24
Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
defects, Armament claims damages from loss of use and diminution in value of the product line of baton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12563 - 2005-03-31
defects, Armament claims damages from loss of use and diminution in value of the product line of baton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12563 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D. Singleton
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that portion of a summary judgment dismissing his unjust enrichment claim.1 He contends there are genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32146 - 2014-09-15
that portion of a summary judgment dismissing his unjust enrichment claim.1 He contends there are genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32146 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in the value of the sign site.” The letter went on to explain that if Lamar has “a claim for leasehold value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64403 - 2011-05-24
in the value of the sign site.” The letter went on to explain that if Lamar has “a claim for leasehold value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64403 - 2011-05-24
Socorro Angelica Alfaro v. Jerry Frick
claim for the return of her security deposit. She claims that the trial court erred by enforcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7344 - 2005-03-31
claim for the return of her security deposit. She claims that the trial court erred by enforcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the order denying his motion for reconsideration. The circuit court determined that his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204972 - 2017-12-08
the order denying his motion for reconsideration. The circuit court determined that his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204972 - 2017-12-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rejected the claim as an untimely effort to challenge the exercise of sentencing discretion. Lindsey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19
rejected the claim as an untimely effort to challenge the exercise of sentencing discretion. Lindsey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19