Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20841 - 20850 of 44407 for name change.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the joint between the two slabs of concrete had not changed since May 2010. ¶21 Blank points first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140981 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 15
court recognized, we must analyze the change of tack by Westmoreland’s lawyer in her summation against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31309 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
] change of heart,” but something more than a mere desire for a trial. State v. Shanks, 152 Wis.2d 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31

John O. Norquist v. Cate Zeuske
that because the value of his agricultural land could decrease and will inevitably change by a degree different
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17126 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is not unconstitutional.” Id. at 446. ¶24 Mason’s trial counsel was not ineffective by foregoing an effort to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100406 - 2013-08-05

[PDF] WI APP 124
confirmed that the evidentiary significance of items observed in the buildings changed during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70129 - 2014-09-15

WI App 124 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP411-CR Complete Title...
] Fassbender confirmed that the evidentiary significance of items observed in the buildings changed during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70129 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] WI 51
, "which friend?" and Sitzberger responded with the name "Jake" who he said lived "a couple blocks down
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373598 - 2021-07-15

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Democratic Senators In Support of Petition for Original Action
arrived upon by making as few changes as possible, applying a “least change” approach, to the Case
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_democratresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16

State v. Michael S. Piddington
is not applicable here, the changes elucidate the legislature's intent. Evident in the amendment to Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17514 - 2005-03-31