Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20851 - 20860 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20851 - 20860 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Habermehl Electric, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
an interpretation of a statute, we review that legal issue de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5347 - 2017-09-19
an interpretation of a statute, we review that legal issue de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5347 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113969 - 2017-09-21
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 61 Wis. 2d 236, 244, 212 N.W.2d 489 (1973) (adopting the Barker test). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327603 - 2021-01-26
, 61 Wis. 2d 236, 244, 212 N.W.2d 489 (1973) (adopting the Barker test). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327603 - 2021-01-26
Sarah Malone v. Joseph Fons
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11725 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11725 - 2005-03-31
Theresa Ann Bushelman v. William Henry Bushelman
of statutory construction, an issue of law which we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2369 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction, an issue of law which we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Quintin D. L'Minggio v. Jane Gamble
poses a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Woods v. Morgan, 224 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16483 - 2017-09-21
poses a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Woods v. Morgan, 224 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
Western Wisconsin Water, Inc. v. Quality Beverages of Wisconsin, Inc.
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7174 - 2005-03-31
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7174 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59109 - 2011-02-22
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59109 - 2011-02-22
2006 WI APP 200
“We review an order for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26469 - 2006-10-30
“We review an order for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26469 - 2006-10-30