Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 29740 for des.

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Behnken
met is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d 272, 283 ¶14, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3287 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30066 - 2007-08-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310–11. ¶14 ¶14 Absent legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192734 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
11 ¶25 Whether the homicide counts were properly joined is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175060 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
construction which this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21

Town of Port Washington v. City of Port Washington
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2730 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bruce E. Black
subject to de novo review. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15692 - 2005-03-31

Keith Love v. John Eversman
judgment is well known. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31

Keith Love v. John Eversman
judgment is well known. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14266 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christopher Deon Vance
) to an undisputed set of facts. This presents a question of law and our review is de novo. State v. Holloway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5772 - 2017-09-19