Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 70160 for his.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 70160 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
of first-degree intentional homicide, as party to a crime, and from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
of first-degree intentional homicide, as party to a crime, and from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
. 1 Jerry Rooni appeals a judgment of conviction entered on his guilty plea to one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
. 1 Jerry Rooni appeals a judgment of conviction entered on his guilty plea to one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony L.K.
his admission, for possession of marijuana. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11443 - 2017-09-19
his admission, for possession of marijuana. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11443 - 2017-09-19
State v. Harold C. Mikkelson
granting Harold Mikkelson’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from within his house. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4312 - 2005-03-31
granting Harold Mikkelson’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from within his house. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is unconstitutional. We reject his arguments, and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Burris first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93420 - 2014-09-15
is unconstitutional. We reject his arguments, and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Burris first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93420 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied his “petition for writ of error.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
that denied his “petition for writ of error.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
CA Blank Order
of his mentally and physically disabled twenty-eight-year-old stepdaughter.[2] An amended complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98930 - 2013-07-09
of his mentally and physically disabled twenty-eight-year-old stepdaughter.[2] An amended complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98930 - 2013-07-09
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court vacated the award because it duplicated credit that Pinkens had received against his term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107891 - 2014-02-05
, the circuit court vacated the award because it duplicated credit that Pinkens had received against his term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107891 - 2014-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
issues of material fact, and the summary judgment procedure is unconstitutional. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93420 - 2013-02-27
issues of material fact, and the summary judgment procedure is unconstitutional. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93420 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
WI App 11
2 alleged assault, and an order that denied his postconviction motion for a new trial.1 Among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488128 - 2022-04-11
2 alleged assault, and an order that denied his postconviction motion for a new trial.1 Among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488128 - 2022-04-11