Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
State v. Deandra S. Carter
to §§ 931.14(t), 961.01(14), and 961.41(3g)(e), Stats. Carter claims the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 931.14(t), 961.01(14), and 961.41(3g)(e), Stats. Carter claims the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Loken is not claiming that, when he entered his pleas moments later, he did not understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732084 - 2023-11-22
that Loken is not claiming that, when he entered his pleas moments later, he did not understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732084 - 2023-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1991). Duncan’s claim that his alleged statutory eligibility is a new factor was previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115583 - 2014-06-30
. App. 1991). Duncan’s claim that his alleged statutory eligibility is a new factor was previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115583 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
Tony Walker v. Department of Corrections
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in lieu of filing an answer. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15834 - 2017-09-21
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in lieu of filing an answer. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15834 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=864954 - 2024-10-17
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=864954 - 2024-10-17
Tony Chaney v. Jeffery Endicott
several years earlier. We affirm.[2] Chaney filed this small-claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10927 - 2005-03-31
several years earlier. We affirm.[2] Chaney filed this small-claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10927 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mary C. Rath
Rath face to face, and had been shown Rath’s picture by a state security officer. She also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31
Rath face to face, and had been shown Rath’s picture by a state security officer. She also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tony Chaney v. Jeffery Endicott
years earlier. We affirm.2 Chaney filed this small-claims action against Jeffrey Endicott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10927 - 2017-09-20
years earlier. We affirm.2 Chaney filed this small-claims action against Jeffrey Endicott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10927 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Lee Boyd v. Ralph Gesualdo
, J.1 Lee Boyd appeals from a judgment after a bench trial in small claims court. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4177 - 2017-09-19
, J.1 Lee Boyd appeals from a judgment after a bench trial in small claims court. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4177 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donald Brzezinski v. Waukesha County
120 days. The statute covers Brzezinski's claim for financial benefits. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9846 - 2017-09-19
120 days. The statute covers Brzezinski's claim for financial benefits. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9846 - 2017-09-19