Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20871 - 20880 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Amado V. Saldana, Jr.
that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it imposed the maximum consecutive sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it imposed the maximum consecutive sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Umhoefer
, the objection was sustained. No answer was given to the question and the trial court immediately instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11701 - 2017-09-20
, the objection was sustained. No answer was given to the question and the trial court immediately instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11701 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be raised on appeal. After a jury trial, Curet was convicted of one count each of second-degree sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755515 - 2024-01-31
be raised on appeal. After a jury trial, Curet was convicted of one count each of second-degree sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755515 - 2024-01-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because the trial court was required to dismiss one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10360 - 2017-09-20
Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because the trial court was required to dismiss one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10360 - 2017-09-20
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
the trial court for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to the Slocks. Smith appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
the trial court for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to the Slocks. Smith appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffery Rittenhouse
that the trial court improperly considered inaccurate information at his No. 00-1225-CR 2 sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2573 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court improperly considered inaccurate information at his No. 00-1225-CR 2 sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2573 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that the trial court’s plea colloquy with Mussell fulfilled the requirements of Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(a), State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91143 - 2013-01-02
that the trial court’s plea colloquy with Mussell fulfilled the requirements of Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(a), State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91143 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Tracy A. Kiefer
from the intoxilyzer. Deputy Sanke terminated the test and marked it as a refusal. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10776 - 2017-09-20
from the intoxilyzer. Deputy Sanke terminated the test and marked it as a refusal. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10776 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
found him guilty on both counts. The trial court denied DeFliger’s postconviction motion that alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2934 - 2017-09-19
found him guilty on both counts. The trial court denied DeFliger’s postconviction motion that alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2934 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in Precision in 2004 for $300,000. Subsequently, Linda brought an order to show cause in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33809 - 2014-09-15
in Precision in 2004 for $300,000. Subsequently, Linda brought an order to show cause in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33809 - 2014-09-15