Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20881 - 20890 of 39497 for indicated.

COURT OF APPEALS
question is whether the acts indicate the defendant had ‘sufficient time for reflection between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89959 - 2012-12-03

[PDF] WI APP 22
of the words “[t]he sale of” in subdivision 1, indicates that the legislature did not intend to impose a tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
that a “50” score indicates serious impairment, whereas Janella’s actual score, “55,” indicates moderate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6952 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jeffrey R. Schertz
to the information Officer McMillin heard over the police radio, Powers had indicated that Schertz was attempting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15619 - 2005-03-31

Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
value of the taxpayers’ property. As indicated, she also submitted a computer printout of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
years of age at this point, won’t be 23 until November. According to what he indicates to me, has one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32181 - 2008-03-25

Brown County v. Marcella G.
. The guidelines indicate that once a state court is asked to transfer jurisdiction, the court has an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3817 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
, the application indicates that “[m]odifications to existing easements will be sought to accommodate the new 345 kV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64863 - 2011-05-25

State v. Ervin Burris
that supervised release is appropriate. The record in this case indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13204 - 2005-03-31

L & M Seed Company, Inc. v. Elk Mound Feed & Farm Supply, Inc.
and failed to remove a sign that indicated that L & M was still in business. The trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12084 - 2005-03-31