Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 17421 for Cost.
IW Enterprises v. Ronald A. Kopas
it awarded Kopas and Willander actual costs and attorney fees. ¶4 First, IW argues the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6721 - 2005-03-31
it awarded Kopas and Willander actual costs and attorney fees. ¶4 First, IW argues the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Darrell Harding v. Parmod Kumar
] counterclaim, statutory costs and fees pursuant to secs. 814.03 and 814.04, Stats.”; and • granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15822 - 2017-09-21
] counterclaim, statutory costs and fees pursuant to secs. 814.03 and 814.04, Stats.”; and • granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15822 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
repair or replacement costs or the value of the property on a specified date. WIS. STAT. § 973.20(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
repair or replacement costs or the value of the property on a specified date. WIS. STAT. § 973.20(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
Frontsheet
misconduct and that he should be required to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which were $2,617.78
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
misconduct and that he should be required to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which were $2,617.78
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
[PDF]
WI 84
be required to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which were $2,617.78 as of April 13, 2012. Because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
be required to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which were $2,617.78 as of April 13, 2012. Because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 96
.” The purpose of the fee was to apportion, on land developers, a share of the costs the Town would incur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51230 - 2014-09-15
.” The purpose of the fee was to apportion, on land developers, a share of the costs the Town would incur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51230 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
denied their claim for fees, but held them liable for the defense costs incurred by Farmers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12513 - 2017-09-21
denied their claim for fees, but held them liable for the defense costs incurred by Farmers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12513 - 2017-09-21
Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
denied their claim for fees, but held them liable for the defense costs incurred by Farmers & Merchants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
denied their claim for fees, but held them liable for the defense costs incurred by Farmers & Merchants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
Darrell Harding v. Parmod Kumar
], on [Kumar’s] counterclaim, statutory costs and fees pursuant to secs. 814.03 and 814.04, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15822 - 2005-03-31
], on [Kumar’s] counterclaim, statutory costs and fees pursuant to secs. 814.03 and 814.04, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15822 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment. With respect to M&I’s motion for reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred postjudgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10
the judgment. With respect to M&I’s motion for reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred postjudgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63774 - 2011-05-10