Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 4377 for bd.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 4377 for bd.
[PDF]
WI APP 140
. Examining Bd., 225 Wis. 2d 552, 556, 593 N.W.2d 481 (Ct. App. 1999). We will not disturb an agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28681 - 2014-09-15
. Examining Bd., 225 Wis. 2d 552, 556, 593 N.W.2d 481 (Ct. App. 1999). We will not disturb an agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28681 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 112
by one party and denied by another. Kozsdiy v. O’Fallon Bd. of Fire and Police Comm’rs, 334 N.E.2d 325
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33061 - 2008-07-29
by one party and denied by another. Kozsdiy v. O’Fallon Bd. of Fire and Police Comm’rs, 334 N.E.2d 325
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33061 - 2008-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. Town Bd. of the Town of Weston, 156 Wis. 2d 588, 598, 457 N.W.2d 510 (Ct. App. 1990). “The fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33969 - 2008-09-09
. Town Bd. of the Town of Weston, 156 Wis. 2d 588, 598, 457 N.W.2d 510 (Ct. App. 1990). “The fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33969 - 2008-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.’” Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137262 - 2017-09-21
they are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.’” Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas L. Koeberl v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
as a matter of law may we reverse its findings of fact. See State ex rel. Harris v. Annuity & Pension Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4388 - 2017-09-19
as a matter of law may we reverse its findings of fact. See State ex rel. Harris v. Annuity & Pension Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4388 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kathleen S. Vitalis v. Daniel J. Vitalis
, not the appellate court, is the arbiter of the weight and credibility of testimony. See Estate of Wolff v. Town Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11302 - 2017-09-19
, not the appellate court, is the arbiter of the weight and credibility of testimony. See Estate of Wolff v. Town Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11302 - 2017-09-19
Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
their decisions are already gauged under the “substantial evidence test.” See Clark v. Waupaca County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2005-03-31
their decisions are already gauged under the “substantial evidence test.” See Clark v. Waupaca County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v. Lukaszewski, 112 Wis. 2d 197, 205, 332 N.W.2d 774 (1983) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137262 - 2015-03-11
.’” Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v. Lukaszewski, 112 Wis. 2d 197, 205, 332 N.W.2d 774 (1983) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137262 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
litigation. City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Bd., 216 Wis. 2d 616, 622, 575 N.W.2d 712 (1998). Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
litigation. City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Bd., 216 Wis. 2d 616, 622, 575 N.W.2d 712 (1998). Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation by those responsible for its enforcement. State ex rel. B’nai B’rith Found. v. Walworth County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30485 - 2007-10-02
interpretation by those responsible for its enforcement. State ex rel. B’nai B’rith Found. v. Walworth County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30485 - 2007-10-02