Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 3968 for davi.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 3968 for davi.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 Potts’s pleas were taken and his sentences imposed by the Honorable Cynthia M. Davis. Potts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
1 Potts’s pleas were taken and his sentences imposed by the Honorable Cynthia M. Davis. Potts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the issues that were raised[.]” See Lee v. Davis, 328 F.3d 896, 900 (7th Cir. 2003). The burden
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
to the issues that were raised[.]” See Lee v. Davis, 328 F.3d 896, 900 (7th Cir. 2003). The burden
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
State v. Carl Andre Brown
Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994)). Brown’s reference to not being able to afford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994)). Brown’s reference to not being able to afford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Davis, 2011 WI App 147, 337 Wis. 2d 688, 808 N.W.2d 130, as a case where this court reversed “because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154142 - 2017-09-21
. Davis, 2011 WI App 147, 337 Wis. 2d 688, 808 N.W.2d 130, as a case where this court reversed “because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95729 - 2014-09-15
DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95729 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Julian M. Barler (L.C. #2017CF642) Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251823 - 2020-01-02
. Julian M. Barler (L.C. #2017CF642) Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251823 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
Willie Hampton v. Jose T. Lloren, M.D.
dispute on an Eighth Amendment claim. See Davis v. Schmidt, 57 F.R.D. 37, 41 (W.D. Wis. 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11409 - 2017-09-19
dispute on an Eighth Amendment claim. See Davis v. Schmidt, 57 F.R.D. 37, 41 (W.D. Wis. 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11409 - 2017-09-19
George E. Thornton v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
regularly in making its determination. Davis v. Industrial Comm’n, 22 Wis. 2d 674, 678-79, 126 N.W.2d 611
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5228 - 2005-03-31
regularly in making its determination. Davis v. Industrial Comm’n, 22 Wis. 2d 674, 678-79, 126 N.W.2d 611
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5228 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Rucker
was wrong. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 319-20 (1974). No. 96-1763-CR 6 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10993 - 2017-09-19
was wrong. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 319-20 (1974). No. 96-1763-CR 6 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10993 - 2017-09-19