Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 30191 for de.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Brown
a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15155 - 2017-09-21
a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15155 - 2017-09-21
Catherine A. Dellabella v. Dellabella Motors, Inc.
orders. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25192 - 2006-05-17
orders. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25192 - 2006-05-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45665 - 2014-09-15
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45665 - 2014-09-15
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo. See Atkinson, 211 Wis. 2d at 638. ¶8 The Austins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo. See Atkinson, 211 Wis. 2d at 638. ¶8 The Austins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32180 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32180 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
of which are subject to our de novo review. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
of which are subject to our de novo review. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13