Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 30059 for de.
State v. Craig A. Sommer
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-08 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2009AP2890 2 de novo jury trial. We understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52615 - 2014-09-15
-08 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2009AP2890 2 de novo jury trial. We understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 23
.-2. Seatz argued to the municipal court—and later to the circuit court, which held a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107401 - 2017-09-21
.-2. Seatz argued to the municipal court—and later to the circuit court, which held a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the trial court and review the grant or denial de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102237 - 2017-09-21
as the trial court and review the grant or denial de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102237 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Newingham has run.[1] We affirm. ¶2 We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59638 - 2011-02-02
Newingham has run.[1] We affirm. ¶2 We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59638 - 2011-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the indemnity settlements plus taxable costs. Chartis appeals. ¶5 Our standard of review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108751 - 2014-03-11
of the indemnity settlements plus taxable costs. Chartis appeals. ¶5 Our standard of review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108751 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848458 - 2024-09-11
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848458 - 2024-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848458 - 2024-09-11
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848458 - 2024-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28