Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim. Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim. Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72524 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72524 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2) (2017-18). We review a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264668 - 2020-06-16
(2) (2017-18). We review a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264668 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings de novo under the documentary evidence exception to the clearly erroneous standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230546 - 2018-12-11
findings de novo under the documentary evidence exception to the clearly erroneous standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230546 - 2018-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30004 - 2007-08-15
evidence. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30004 - 2007-08-15
Amerequip Corporation -- New Holstein v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
presents a question of law which this court may review de novo. We disagree. Even when the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14715 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law which this court may review de novo. We disagree. Even when the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14715 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Newingham has run.[1] We affirm. ¶2 We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59638 - 2011-02-02
Newingham has run.[1] We affirm. ¶2 We review orders granting summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59638 - 2011-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court order dismissing his appeal from a municipal court judgment and his request for a de novo jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52615 - 2010-07-27
court order dismissing his appeal from a municipal court judgment and his request for a de novo jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52615 - 2010-07-27