Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 69114 for he.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 69114 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1g., 961.41(3g)(c) and 939.05 (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51249 - 2010-06-21
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1g., 961.41(3g)(c) and 939.05 (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51249 - 2010-06-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
of law in Wisconsin in 1997. He has no prior disciplinary history. ¶4 The OLR filed a complaint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20713 - 2017-09-21
of law in Wisconsin in 1997. He has no prior disciplinary history. ¶4 The OLR filed a complaint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20713 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
Gamino was admitted to the practice of law in Wisconsin in 1997. He has no prior disciplinary history
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20713 - 2005-12-19
Gamino was admitted to the practice of law in Wisconsin in 1997. He has no prior disciplinary history
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20713 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Barry M. Jenkins
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21578 - 2017-09-21
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21578 - 2017-09-21
State v. Barry M. Jenkins
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
driving while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues: (1) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85843 - 2012-08-06
driving while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues: (1) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85843 - 2012-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
State v. Byron A. Anderson
of conviction for operating while intoxicated (OWI), third offense. He argues that he was effectively under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
of conviction for operating while intoxicated (OWI), third offense. He argues that he was effectively under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Byron A. Anderson
offense. He argues that he was effectively under arrest when the arresting officer told him he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
offense. He argues that he was effectively under arrest when the arresting officer told him he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21