Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 6143 for li.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 6143 for li.
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony at trial from the Sensitive Crimes Division officer that Jasmine B. told her she lied when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91084 - 2013-01-02
testimony at trial from the Sensitive Crimes Division officer that Jasmine B. told her she lied when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91084 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
of record. ¶8 The decision to grant or deny a motion for mistrial lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
of record. ¶8 The decision to grant or deny a motion for mistrial lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
court’s exercise of sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion; our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97900 - 2013-06-11
court’s exercise of sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion; our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97900 - 2013-06-11
Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
placement schedule lies within the discretion of the trial court. Wiederholt v. Fischer, 169 Wis.2d 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14627 - 2005-03-31
placement schedule lies within the discretion of the trial court. Wiederholt v. Fischer, 169 Wis.2d 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Elsila’s arguments. ¶8 Elsila contends that her neighbor “lied in court with the property damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19
Elsila’s arguments. ¶8 Elsila contends that her neighbor “lied in court with the property damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 16, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court ...
The admissibility of evidence lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. See State v. Pepin, 110 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69506 - 2011-08-15
The admissibility of evidence lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. See State v. Pepin, 110 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69506 - 2011-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
lies outside the scope of certiorari review, a writ of habeas corpus is available to review counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35010 - 2008-12-22
lies outside the scope of certiorari review, a writ of habeas corpus is available to review counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35010 - 2008-12-22
State v. Gerald Seay
and ninety days. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion, and our review is limited to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2005-03-31
and ninety days. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion, and our review is limited to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick Emerson
of repeat-offender penalty enhancers, as with most sentencing decisions, lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
of repeat-offender penalty enhancers, as with most sentencing decisions, lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
State v. Singkeo Inphachack
believed that Inphachack lied when he claimed that he was in Milwaukee eating noodles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31
believed that Inphachack lied when he claimed that he was in Milwaukee eating noodles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9362 - 2005-03-31