Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 17105 for probate/1000.
Search results 2091 - 2100 of 17105 for probate/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The defendant, Jeremiah Purtell, was on probation following conviction for two counts of cruelty to animals when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
. The defendant, Jeremiah Purtell, was on probation following conviction for two counts of cruelty to animals when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, P.J. The defendant, Jeremiah Purtell, was on probation following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93766 - 2014-09-15
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, P.J. The defendant, Jeremiah Purtell, was on probation following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93766 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sean W. Ottman
sentence credit for thirty days’ jail time ordered to be served as a condition of probation concurrently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15975 - 2017-09-21
sentence credit for thirty days’ jail time ordered to be served as a condition of probation concurrently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15975 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it denied his motion to find that a probation term was concurrent to a prison term. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29166 - 2007-05-29
erred when it denied his motion to find that a probation term was concurrent to a prison term. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29166 - 2007-05-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred when it denied his No. 2006AP1146-CR 2 motion to find that a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29166 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred when it denied his No. 2006AP1146-CR 2 motion to find that a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29166 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing two separate terms of probation whose aggregate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115651 - 2014-07-01
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing two separate terms of probation whose aggregate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115651 - 2014-07-01
[PDF]
State v. Steve Norton
of the sentence up to the trial court. ¶3 At the time of the offense, Norton was serving two years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3445 - 2017-09-19
of the sentence up to the trial court. ¶3 At the time of the offense, Norton was serving two years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3445 - 2017-09-19
State v. Todd E. Crider
of jail time imposed as a condition of probation was not “time … spent in actual confinement serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
of jail time imposed as a condition of probation was not “time … spent in actual confinement serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steve Norton
of the offense, Norton was serving two years’ probation for a misdemeanor theft conviction from June 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
of the offense, Norton was serving two years’ probation for a misdemeanor theft conviction from June 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
State v. Julie Dixon
appeals from an order extending her probation following a conviction for forgery as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order extending her probation following a conviction for forgery as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31