Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20901 - 20910 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 20901 - 20910 of 74557 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
previous land-division ordinances. ¶4 The owners then recorded their CSMs with the Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29504 - 2007-06-27
previous land-division ordinances. ¶4 The owners then recorded their CSMs with the Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29504 - 2007-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, reviewed Johnson’s attendance records with her and compelled3 her to explain why she had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92831 - 2014-09-15
, however, reviewed Johnson’s attendance records with her and compelled3 her to explain why she had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92831 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
set forth on the record.” The transcript of the Machner hearing, however, is not included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
set forth on the record.” The transcript of the Machner hearing, however, is not included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
will be recorded.” Andersen stated that he wished to dispute the debt because he had moved from the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87122 - 2012-09-18
will be recorded.” Andersen stated that he wished to dispute the debt because he had moved from the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87122 - 2012-09-18
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
. Elizondo was initially charged with felony welfare fraud--in particular, that in applying for public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
. Elizondo was initially charged with felony welfare fraud--in particular, that in applying for public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
a fact-finding date of December 1, 2000, noting on the record that this date would run “a little bit over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4796 - 2005-03-31
a fact-finding date of December 1, 2000, noting on the record that this date would run “a little bit over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916439 - 2025-02-19
a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916439 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
: No. THE COURT: Did you ever talk to the Public Defender’s office? THE DEFENDANT: I didn’t – I make too much
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
: No. THE COURT: Did you ever talk to the Public Defender’s office? THE DEFENDANT: I didn’t – I make too much
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
State v. Troy D. Moore
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Suzanne Hagopian, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4124 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Suzanne Hagopian, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4124 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
did not have the record available, was unaware of the earlier proceeding. Apparently, the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26196 - 2006-08-14
did not have the record available, was unaware of the earlier proceeding. Apparently, the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26196 - 2006-08-14