Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20911 - 20920 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20911 - 20920 of 29823 for des.
Western Wisconsin Water, Inc. v. Quality Beverages of Wisconsin, Inc.
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7009 - 2015-03-31
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7009 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
Theresa Ann Bushelman v. William Henry Bushelman
we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis. 2d 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2369 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis. 2d 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2369 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo decisions on both a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. See Meyers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145483 - 2017-09-21
review de novo decisions on both a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. See Meyers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
pollution” and “owned property” exclusions.1 ¶21 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59109 - 2014-09-15
pollution” and “owned property” exclusions.1 ¶21 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59109 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald V. McCallum
subject to de novo review. State v. Coogan, 154 Wis. 2d 387, 394-95, 453 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1990
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17021 - 2017-09-21
subject to de novo review. State v. Coogan, 154 Wis. 2d 387, 394-95, 453 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1990
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17021 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
the property at $4,425,000 in 2012 and at $4,169,000 in 2013. Regency West filed a de novo refund action
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=758&year=2016
the property at $4,425,000 in 2012 and at $4,169,000 in 2013. Regency West filed a de novo refund action
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=758&year=2016
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102719 - 2017-09-21
). Whether a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 20
interpretation this court reviews de novo. See St. Croix Cnty. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs. v. Michael D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964973 - 2025-06-03
interpretation this court reviews de novo. See St. Croix Cnty. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs. v. Michael D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964973 - 2025-06-03
Sarah Malone v. Joseph Fons
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11725 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ronald A. Arthur
and reflected in the record. After our de novo review of the referee's conclusions of law, see In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17742 - 2017-09-21
and reflected in the record. After our de novo review of the referee's conclusions of law, see In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17742 - 2017-09-21