Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20911 - 20920 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 20911 - 20920 of 63609 for records/1000.
State v. David A. H.
N.W.2d 30 (1998). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 30 (1998). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01
State v. Gwendolyn K. Moody
. Specifically, she argues that it didn’t meet the exceptions to the hearsay rule for public records and records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15568 - 2005-03-31
. Specifically, she argues that it didn’t meet the exceptions to the hearsay rule for public records and records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record and jury trial, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142936 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record and jury trial, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142936 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
that, as far as is shown by this record, the decision he wants reviewed has not yet been issued in final form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15683 - 2017-09-21
that, as far as is shown by this record, the decision he wants reviewed has not yet been issued in final form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roberto G. Castanon
by number only and that no specific identifying information be elicited on the record. ¶4 The impaneling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15660 - 2017-09-21
by number only and that no specific identifying information be elicited on the record. ¶4 The impaneling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15660 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107811 - 2014-02-11
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107811 - 2014-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215851 - 2018-07-25
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215851 - 2018-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829715 - 2024-07-23
a response. Upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829715 - 2024-07-23