Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20911 - 20920 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 20911 - 20920 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
egregious as to infect the trial with unfairness in violation of Shaw’s due process rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753850 - 2024-01-24
egregious as to infect the trial with unfairness in violation of Shaw’s due process rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753850 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
Hans A. Schmidt v. Robert G. Babcock
, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's policy is ambiguous and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9041 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's policy is ambiguous and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9041 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred when it dismissed MBS’s damages claims based on its application of the voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53103 - 2010-08-09
that the trial court erred when it dismissed MBS’s damages claims based on its application of the voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53103 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
State v. Charles Dante Higgs
the missing “bodily harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
the missing “bodily harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment stage, and that her trial counsel did not perform deficiently. S.D. appeals. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226667 - 2018-11-08
judgment stage, and that her trial counsel did not perform deficiently. S.D. appeals. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226667 - 2018-11-08
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
, that the trial court erred by failing to consider whether there were any “reasonable and appropriate alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31
, that the trial court erred by failing to consider whether there were any “reasonable and appropriate alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
he did not understand the diversion agreement. He also claims, however, that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
he did not understand the diversion agreement. He also claims, however, that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Mary Nell Matzdorf
(1)(b), STATS. Matzdorf argues on appeal that the trial court erroneously denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12760 - 2017-09-21
(1)(b), STATS. Matzdorf argues on appeal that the trial court erroneously denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12760 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles Dante Higgs
harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying Higgs’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14195 - 2005-03-31
harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying Higgs’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14195 - 2005-03-31