Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20921 - 20930 of 40067 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 20921 - 20930 of 40067 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Nevada Jerome
counsel, and listened to statements from Jerome, his wife, and her daughter. In sentencing Jerome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5900 - 2005-03-31
counsel, and listened to statements from Jerome, his wife, and her daughter. In sentencing Jerome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5900 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the statement that you possessed a weapon, is everything else in that armed robbery complaint true, sir
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163239 - 2017-09-21
for the statement that you possessed a weapon, is everything else in that armed robbery complaint true, sir
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163239 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 We review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
¶6 We review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of an employee as provided in s. 108.04(13)(f), or because of a claimant’s false statement or misrepresentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139398 - 2015-04-08
of an employee as provided in s. 108.04(13)(f), or because of a claimant’s false statement or misrepresentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139398 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his statements made to police during interrogation were involuntary, and for failing to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112453 - 2017-09-21
that his statements made to police during interrogation were involuntary, and for failing to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responded, “I think you need to because your last statement was that Count 1 would be concurrent … I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
responded, “I think you need to because your last statement was that Count 1 would be concurrent … I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bernard A. James
the statements courts are required to give to explain the bifurcated sentence.[5] The court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
the statements courts are required to give to explain the bifurcated sentence.[5] The court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in a statement to police, although at trial, Ward told the jury that he lied about that and other things in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
in a statement to police, although at trial, Ward told the jury that he lied about that and other things in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
not to address in detail because they plainly lack merit. For example, Prent attributes a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
not to address in detail because they plainly lack merit. For example, Prent attributes a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
State v. Charles Brown
because the defendant’s misunderstanding was the result of statements the prosecution or defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7011 - 2005-03-31
because the defendant’s misunderstanding was the result of statements the prosecution or defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7011 - 2005-03-31