Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20921 - 20930 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 20921 - 20930 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
claim that his trial counsel was ineffective. To be entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73239 - 2011-11-02
claim that his trial counsel was ineffective. To be entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73239 - 2011-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals. Wurtzinger raises four claims of evidentiary error: (1) the circuit court allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590167 - 2022-11-16
appeals. Wurtzinger raises four claims of evidentiary error: (1) the circuit court allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590167 - 2022-11-16
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
in support of her “unfairness” claim. She says first that she was incarcerated in the Rock County Jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2364 - 2005-03-31
in support of her “unfairness” claim. She says first that she was incarcerated in the Rock County Jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2364 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, according to its title, sought sentence modification based on a new factor. Hills claims that new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104443 - 2013-11-18
, according to its title, sought sentence modification based on a new factor. Hills claims that new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104443 - 2013-11-18
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
in support of her “unfairness” claim. She says first that she was incarcerated in the Rock County Jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2363 - 2005-03-31
in support of her “unfairness” claim. She says first that she was incarcerated in the Rock County Jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2363 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
, STATS., and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. On appeal, Schlitt claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
, STATS., and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. On appeal, Schlitt claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Davis
(8) (1999-2000). 1 Davis also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
(8) (1999-2000). 1 Davis also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
4 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11851 - 2017-09-21
4 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11851 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
4 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11853 - 2017-09-21
4 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11853 - 2017-09-21
Betty Novak v. Plum Creek Timberlands
because the plaintiffs did not record their easement claim within the time provided in Wis. Stat. § 893.33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6243 - 2005-03-31
because the plaintiffs did not record their easement claim within the time provided in Wis. Stat. § 893.33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6243 - 2005-03-31