Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20921 - 20930 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 20921 - 20930 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Cynthia M.
§ 48.415(1)(a)2, as well as the trial court’s conclusion that termination was in Angela’s best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
§ 48.415(1)(a)2, as well as the trial court’s conclusion that termination was in Angela’s best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failure to pick up its cable equipment from Greenbriar’s premises. A trial to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101415 - 2017-09-21
failure to pick up its cable equipment from Greenbriar’s premises. A trial to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101415 - 2017-09-21
Joseph Leitinger v. Van Buren Management
Wis. 2d 31, 630 N.W.2d 201. Therefore, we reverse the judgment. Despite this reversal, no new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25661 - 2006-07-25
Wis. 2d 31, 630 N.W.2d 201. Therefore, we reverse the judgment. Despite this reversal, no new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25661 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
Joseph Leitinger v. Van Buren Management
this reversal, no new trial is necessary because the parties have stipulated to what will happen if this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25661 - 2017-09-21
this reversal, no new trial is necessary because the parties have stipulated to what will happen if this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response to the no-merit report, Robles asserts that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because (1) trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206159 - 2017-12-27
response to the no-merit report, Robles asserts that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because (1) trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206159 - 2017-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
on the grounds that the trial court improperly revised its original restrictions against Penkalski in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57060 - 2010-11-23
on the grounds that the trial court improperly revised its original restrictions against Penkalski in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57060 - 2010-11-23
State v. Robert O. Schmidt
pertaining to conduct with Sarah. At trial, eleven-year-old Stephanie W. testified that Schmidt appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14157 - 2005-03-31
pertaining to conduct with Sarah. At trial, eleven-year-old Stephanie W. testified that Schmidt appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14157 - 2005-03-31
Philip Esser v. Richard Skogen
relied on hearsay, and that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to sustain the damage award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10520 - 2005-03-31
relied on hearsay, and that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to sustain the damage award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10520 - 2005-03-31
Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
at the custody trial and testified on Johnson’s behalf. Goswitz argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14777 - 2005-03-31
at the custody trial and testified on Johnson’s behalf. Goswitz argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14777 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale Marek
that an ink comparison might provide evidence that the detective lied at trial to bolster the credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13409 - 2005-03-31
that an ink comparison might provide evidence that the detective lied at trial to bolster the credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13409 - 2005-03-31