Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that the circuit court erred in admitting evidence regarding those cases, and that the prosecutor engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21
, that the circuit court erred in admitting evidence regarding those cases, and that the prosecutor engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the 1996 case was unavailable. See, generally, SCR 72.01 (regarding retention of court records). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105971 - 2017-09-21
in the 1996 case was unavailable. See, generally, SCR 72.01 (regarding retention of court records). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and thereafter dismissed it from the case. Appellants appealed. The circuit court proceedings are on hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456151 - 2021-11-24
and thereafter dismissed it from the case. Appellants appealed. The circuit court proceedings are on hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456151 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing that occurred in the 1998 Shawano County case, but she was informed the court reporters’ notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139332 - 2017-09-21
hearing that occurred in the 1998 Shawano County case, but she was informed the court reporters’ notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s order dismissing charges in this case. On remand, Kuenzi moved for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101162 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s order dismissing charges in this case. On remand, Kuenzi moved for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101162 - 2017-09-21
Barbara A. Jones v. Dane County
, the trial court dismissed the § 1983 claim on summary judgment motion. The case went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7680 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court dismissed the § 1983 claim on summary judgment motion. The case went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At that hearing, the court called Iron County case No. 2018CV10 (the case corresponding to Summerhill’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
. At that hearing, the court called Iron County case No. 2018CV10 (the case corresponding to Summerhill’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contested case hearing prior to NRB reapproving the 2016 Master Plan. The circuit court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041525 - 2025-11-25
the contested case hearing prior to NRB reapproving the 2016 Master Plan. The circuit court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041525 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734410 - 2023-11-28
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734410 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734390 - 2023-11-28
. Tony’s final argument is that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in Tisha’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734390 - 2023-11-28