Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 29740 for des.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown
assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12715 - 2017-09-21
assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Pedro Enrique-Gaitan
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15682 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Dodge County
a de novo determination of Jason H.’s residency, based upon the parties’ stipulation of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3134 - 2017-09-19
a de novo determination of Jason H.’s residency, based upon the parties’ stipulation of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3134 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roger P. Barber
this court may review de novo.” Id. The constitutional right to present evidence is grounded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
this court may review de novo.” Id. The constitutional right to present evidence is grounded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene W.
disposition and the possible sanctions is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4330 - 2005-03-31
disposition and the possible sanctions is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4330 - 2005-03-31
Brittany Frost v. Doreen Whitbeck
Standard of Review. ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3579 - 2005-03-31
Standard of Review. ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3579 - 2005-03-31
Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. F.R., 225 Wis. 2d at 637. B. Unfitness Requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31
an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. F.R., 225 Wis. 2d at 637. B. Unfitness Requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict presents a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict presents a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
State v. Jay D. Harris
. However, whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16062 - 2005-03-31
. However, whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis.2d 112, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11161 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis.2d 112, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11161 - 2017-09-19