Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 41710 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 41710 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. James E. Erickson
), because he did not receive the correct number of peremptory challenges during jury selection. 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17357 - 2017-09-21
), because he did not receive the correct number of peremptory challenges during jury selection. 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17357 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lester E. Hahn
interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s proposed jury instructions in this case, we rejected the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13165 - 2017-09-21
interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s proposed jury instructions in this case, we rejected the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13165 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
how certain she was, she stated, “100 percent.” ¶5 A jury found Nieto guilty on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36572 - 2009-05-26
how certain she was, she stated, “100 percent.” ¶5 A jury found Nieto guilty on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36572 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
revealed inconsistencies between A.B.’s interview statements and A.B.’s trial testimony that the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852047 - 2024-09-19
revealed inconsistencies between A.B.’s interview statements and A.B.’s trial testimony that the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852047 - 2024-09-19
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
to support the jury’s guilty verdict because there was no conclusive evidence at trial that the endorsement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15802 - 2005-03-31
to support the jury’s guilty verdict because there was no conclusive evidence at trial that the endorsement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
violence. The case was tried to a jury. The State presented two witnesses, Dr. Meg Cho
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13790 - 2014-09-15
violence. The case was tried to a jury. The State presented two witnesses, Dr. Meg Cho
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13790 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of three counts of willfully omitting a material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of three counts of willfully omitting a material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
State v. Israel Soto
a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12613 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12613 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). This case was tried to a jury in June 2007 after which Thames was found not guilty on the fleeing charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
). This case was tried to a jury in June 2007 after which Thames was found not guilty on the fleeing charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
State v. Michael Thompson
which would not have brought the matter within earshot of witnesses, trial participants and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2281 - 2017-09-19
which would not have brought the matter within earshot of witnesses, trial participants and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2281 - 2017-09-19