Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 64166 for records.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 64166 for records.
State v. Ronnie P.
. This court will find an [erroneous exercise] of discretion if the record shows that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15143 - 2005-03-31
. This court will find an [erroneous exercise] of discretion if the record shows that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Hernandez has filed a supplemental response. Having independently reviewed the entire record, reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28
Hernandez has filed a supplemental response. Having independently reviewed the entire record, reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733988 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712972 - 2023-10-11
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712972 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the parties’ filings and an independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
of the parties’ filings and an independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955710 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Julius M. Covington
. § 974.06 (2003-04). 1 Because we conclude that the record conclusively demonstrates that Covington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25086 - 2017-09-21
. § 974.06 (2003-04). 1 Because we conclude that the record conclusively demonstrates that Covington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25086 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114682 - 2026-05-06
the entire record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114682 - 2026-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the ultimate decision of the division to revoke. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178945 - 2017-09-21
, and the ultimate decision of the division to revoke. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32. Bohannon has not filed a response. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125370 - 2017-09-21
809.32. Bohannon has not filed a response. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257971 - 2020-04-14
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257971 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20