Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20941 - 20950 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Dale Marek
that an ink comparison might provide evidence that the detective lied at trial to bolster the credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13409 - 2005-03-31
that an ink comparison might provide evidence that the detective lied at trial to bolster the credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13409 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“for a period of three months or longer.” The trial court answered “yes” to the following first questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117662 - 2014-07-21
“for a period of three months or longer.” The trial court answered “yes” to the following first questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117662 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert O. Schmidt
was acquitted of the two charges pertaining to conduct with Sarah. At trial, eleven-year-old Stephanie W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14157 - 2014-09-15
was acquitted of the two charges pertaining to conduct with Sarah. At trial, eleven-year-old Stephanie W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14157 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. A trial to the circuit court was held in September 2011. At trial, the parties disputed whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101415 - 2005-08-28
. A trial to the circuit court was held in September 2011. At trial, the parties disputed whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101415 - 2005-08-28
Atlas Transit, Inc. v. Spence Korte
CURLEY, J. Atlas Transit, Inc., et al.[1] (collectively, the “bus companies”), appeal from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3523 - 2005-03-31
CURLEY, J. Atlas Transit, Inc., et al.[1] (collectively, the “bus companies”), appeal from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3523 - 2005-03-31
Atlas Transit, Inc. v. Spence Korte
CURLEY, J. Atlas Transit, Inc., et al.[1] (collectively, the “bus companies”), appeal from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3566 - 2005-03-31
CURLEY, J. Atlas Transit, Inc., et al.[1] (collectively, the “bus companies”), appeal from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3566 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. During this questioning, Lawhorn gave a statement; however, after a Miranda-Goodchild hearing, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29135 - 2007-05-21
. During this questioning, Lawhorn gave a statement; however, after a Miranda-Goodchild hearing, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29135 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Dante Higgs
the missing “bodily harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
the missing “bodily harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Hans A. Schmidt v. Robert G. Babcock
, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's policy is ambiguous and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9041 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's policy is ambiguous and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9041 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21