Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20951 - 20960 of 86279 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress 2 Daun Patumbak Deli Serdang.
Search results 20951 - 20960 of 86279 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress 2 Daun Patumbak Deli Serdang.
State v. Charles C. Patterson
. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).[1] We affirm. ¶2 Patterson argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26088 - 2006-08-02
. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).[1] We affirm. ¶2 Patterson argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26088 - 2006-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
“diminished mental capacity” is a new factor justifying a reduced sentence.[1] We affirm the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142464 - 2015-05-26
“diminished mental capacity” is a new factor justifying a reduced sentence.[1] We affirm the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142464 - 2015-05-26
State v. Miguel F. Hirecheta
was insufficient to support the verdicts. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 When reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6740 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to support the verdicts. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 When reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6740 - 2005-03-31
State v. Everett Daniel Neal
, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2), Stats. Neal claims that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10294 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2), Stats. Neal claims that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
2005AP1544 2 Baldwin was entitled to coram nobis relief for the circuit court’s alleged failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28987 - 2014-09-15
2005AP1544 2 Baldwin was entitled to coram nobis relief for the circuit court’s alleged failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Rice
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 95-1471-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 95-1471-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146733 - 2017-09-21
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT IV June 2, 2023 To: Hon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663408 - 2023-06-02
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT IV June 2, 2023 To: Hon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663408 - 2023-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. No. 2017AP1164-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215570 - 2018-07-11
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. No. 2017AP1164-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215570 - 2018-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP901 2 postconviction motion, absent a sufficient reason.” State v. Lo, 2003 WI 107, ¶2, 264
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138500 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP901 2 postconviction motion, absent a sufficient reason.” State v. Lo, 2003 WI 107, ¶2, 264
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138500 - 2017-09-21