Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20951 - 20960 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Joshua Scheideler v. Smith & Associates, Inc.
of the partial settlement agreement presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Unigard Ins. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10331 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. We review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56188 - 2010-11-01

State v. David L. Munroe
is voluntary, are matters that we review de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d at 191–195, 577 N.W.2d at 799–801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2199 - 2005-03-31

Patricia Hause v. John P. Bresina
The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law we review de novo. Danbeck v. American Fam. Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4590 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to relief.” Id., ¶12 (footnote omitted). We determine de novo whether a motion alleges facts that, if true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58303 - 2010-12-27

Kimberly Paswaters v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
appeal. ¶13 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7332 - 2005-03-31

Gary Theige v. County of Vernon
and application of a statute to undisputed facts and, hence, it is a question of law we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12305 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark A. Walters
of constitutional fact we review de novo. State v. Cummings, 199 Wis.2d 721, 748, 546 N.W.2d 406, 416 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 87
is a question of law we review de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42, 320 Wis. 2d 76, 768 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51289 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If, on the other hand, the defendant’s motion “does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490464 - 2022-03-09