Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20951 - 20960 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21

WI App 116 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2521 Complete Title o...
, P.J. Ramona Czaplewski appeals from a trial court order admitting the will of her father, Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86935 - 2012-10-30

[PDF] State v. Johnny Lacy
hoop earrings from Lacy that Chevonne P. later identified as hers. A DNA expert testified at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16081 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred when it dismissed MBS’s damages claims based on its application of the voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53103 - 2010-08-09

[PDF] NOTICE
a Miranda-Goodchild hearing, the trial court suppressed the statement as not voluntary. ¶3 A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
egregious as to infect the trial with unfairness in violation of Shaw’s due process rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753850 - 2024-01-24

State v. Adrienne Luber
to dismiss a second trial on a charge of driving with a prohibited alcohol content (PAC) after a jury had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2275 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, entered after a jury trial, for one count of possession with intent to deliver cocaine (more than five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102852 - 2017-09-21

State v. Johnny Lacy
testified at trial that the DNA pattern from the semen stains on Chevonne P.’s T‑shirt “occurs roughly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31

Hans A. Schmidt v. Robert G. Babcock
for declaratory and summary judgment, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9041 - 2005-03-31