Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20961 - 20970 of 65137 for or b.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is generally not admissible under WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2)(b), Wisconsin’s rape shield law. One exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211863 - 2018-05-02

[PDF] NOTICE
SERVICES, CIGNA, SUBROGATED-PLAINTIFFS, V. MERITER HOSPITAL, INC. D/B/A MERITER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34198 - 2014-09-15

State v. Shawn Riley
)(a), 940.225(1)(b), and 939.05 (1997-98).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2378 - 2005-03-31

Daniel Harr v. Gerald Berge
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: paul b. higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6929 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rickey Gray
.[4] B. Sexual Sadist Issue. ¶14 Gray next contends that he should be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3850 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis A. Denure
. § 346.63(1)(a) and driving with a prohibited alcohol concentration under § 346.63(1)(b). Denure moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3883 - 2005-03-31

State v. Victor E. Holm
a factual basis that the defendant committed the charged crime. Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b).[3] When a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20763 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] State v. Gary K.
48.355(2)(b)6, STATS., mandates the trial court to make a finding “that the agency primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8603 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
., § 893.26(2)(b). In its summary judgment decision, the circuit court stated: “The parties’ proof makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28964 - 2007-05-14

[PDF] State v. Ervin J. Seidl
that authorized by the legislature. See § 343.44(2)(b), STATS. Although the trial court’s sentence was severe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14654 - 2017-09-21