Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20961 - 20970 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 20961 - 20970 of 58507 for speedy trial.
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
, that the trial court erred by failing to consider whether there were any “reasonable and appropriate alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31
, that the trial court erred by failing to consider whether there were any “reasonable and appropriate alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31
Hans A. Schmidt v. Robert G. Babcock
for declaratory and summary judgment, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9041 - 2005-03-31
for declaratory and summary judgment, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a Miranda-Goodchild hearing, the trial court suppressed the statement as not voluntary. ¶3 A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15
a Miranda-Goodchild hearing, the trial court suppressed the statement as not voluntary. ¶3 A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15
State v. Adrienne Luber
to dismiss a second trial on a charge of driving with a prohibited alcohol content (PAC) after a jury had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2275 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss a second trial on a charge of driving with a prohibited alcohol content (PAC) after a jury had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
he did not understand the diversion agreement. He also claims, however, that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
he did not understand the diversion agreement. He also claims, however, that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19968 - 2005-10-17
. Valona also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19968 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment stage, and that her trial counsel did not perform deficiently. S.D. appeals. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226667 - 2018-11-08
judgment stage, and that her trial counsel did not perform deficiently. S.D. appeals. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226667 - 2018-11-08
[PDF]
Hans A. Schmidt v. Robert G. Babcock
, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's policy is ambiguous and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9041 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court concluded that: (1) Exclusion (h) of the storekeeper's policy is ambiguous and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9041 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles Dante Higgs
harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying Higgs’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14195 - 2005-03-31
harm” element. Consequently, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying Higgs’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14195 - 2005-03-31