Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20991 - 21000 of 68517 for did.
Search results 20991 - 21000 of 68517 for did.
State v. Paul L. Eickert
by removing jail time. Because the court did not misuse its discretion in imposing the jail time or in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13735 - 2005-03-31
by removing jail time. Because the court did not misuse its discretion in imposing the jail time or in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by pleading no contest and the elements of the offense. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140294 - 2017-09-21
by pleading no contest and the elements of the offense. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Troy A. Solomon
in regards to [Solomon’s] driving,” that the left turn was legal, and that he did not believe that driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16036 - 2017-09-21
in regards to [Solomon’s] driving,” that the left turn was legal, and that he did not believe that driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16036 - 2017-09-21
State v. Felipe R. Domenech
: And … then, supposing that I had done it, Orlando, and if the woman did not see me, they can’t do anything to me. (SC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18810 - 2005-06-29
: And … then, supposing that I had done it, Orlando, and if the woman did not see me, they can’t do anything to me. (SC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18810 - 2005-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Hans Gerger
that Gerger did not establish that the State breached the agreement, we affirm. ¶2 In 1994, Gerger pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13995 - 2014-09-15
that Gerger did not establish that the State breached the agreement, we affirm. ¶2 In 1994, Gerger pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13995 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
exception, Wis. Stat. § 908.03(6) (2011-12).[1] SunTrust does not appear to dispute that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112697 - 2014-05-21
exception, Wis. Stat. § 908.03(6) (2011-12).[1] SunTrust does not appear to dispute that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112697 - 2014-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ recommendations and that he did not otherwise know this information. Following an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135555 - 2017-09-21
’ recommendations and that he did not otherwise know this information. Following an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment right not to testify. ¶3 The jury did not hear evidence regarding four statements Birr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95673 - 2014-09-15
Amendment right not to testify. ¶3 The jury did not hear evidence regarding four statements Birr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95673 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
and waiver-of-rights form and whether he had signed it. Smith acknowledged that he signed it and said he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
and waiver-of-rights form and whether he had signed it. Smith acknowledged that he signed it and said he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court did not apply the appropriate legal criteria, establishing that Catherine acted egregiously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99823 - 2013-07-18
. The circuit court did not apply the appropriate legal criteria, establishing that Catherine acted egregiously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99823 - 2013-07-18