Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20991 - 21000 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 20991 - 21000 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. Dahl argues we should use our discretionary power to grant her a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31634 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Dahl argues we should use our discretionary power to grant her a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31634 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
right to his counsel of choice when the circuit court refused to adjourn a motion hearing and a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30168 - 2007-11-27
right to his counsel of choice when the circuit court refused to adjourn a motion hearing and a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30168 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
Howard A. Koop v. Woodlake Trails Development Company, Ltd.
supports the assessment; and (4) the trial court erred because (a) it entered an order in the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7776 - 2017-09-19
supports the assessment; and (4) the trial court erred because (a) it entered an order in the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7776 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for his protective placement under WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1) following a jury trial. He argues that Wood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899230 - 2025-01-09
for his protective placement under WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1) following a jury trial. He argues that Wood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899230 - 2025-01-09
Howard A. Koop v. Woodlake Trails Development Company, Ltd.
evidence supports the assessment; and (4) the trial court erred because (a) it entered an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7776 - 2005-03-31
evidence supports the assessment; and (4) the trial court erred because (a) it entered an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7776 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sharon A. Dixon
. §§ 961.16(2)(a)(10) and 941.41(3g)(a)1.[1] Dixon also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 961.16(2)(a)(10) and 941.41(3g)(a)1.[1] Dixon also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., appeals a judgment, entered following a jury trial, convicting him of two counts of battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490829 - 2022-03-08
., appeals a judgment, entered following a jury trial, convicting him of two counts of battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490829 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
Megan M. Lord v. Hubbell, Inc.
children of the decedent.3 The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10665 - 2017-09-20
children of the decedent.3 The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10665 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Emmett Kapries Dunlap
for second-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury, No(s). 96-1283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10783 - 2017-09-20
for second-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury, No(s). 96-1283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10783 - 2017-09-20
Megan M. Lord v. Hubbell, Inc.
children of the decedent.[3] The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10665 - 2005-03-31
children of the decedent.[3] The trial court dismissed both claims on the ground of improper service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10665 - 2005-03-31