Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 211 - 220 of 5441 for WA 0821 1305 0400 Agen Geobag Erosi Berkualitas Kulon Progo DI Yogyakarta [[Tigapillar]].
Search results 211 - 220 of 5441 for WA 0821 1305 0400 Agen Geobag Erosi Berkualitas Kulon Progo DI Yogyakarta [[Tigapillar]].
[PDF]
Ronald E. Patten v. David H. Schwarz
in the Division of Intensive Sanctions (DIS). At the administrative hearing, Lisa Kenyon, Patten’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13106 - 2017-09-21
in the Division of Intensive Sanctions (DIS). At the administrative hearing, Lisa Kenyon, Patten’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13106 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
discretion when it did not place Jackson in the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS) program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12771 - 2017-09-21
discretion when it did not place Jackson in the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS) program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12771 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
misused its discretion when it did not place Jackson in the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2012-03-20
misused its discretion when it did not place Jackson in the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2012-03-20
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
misused its discretion when it did not place Jackson in the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12771 - 2012-03-20
misused its discretion when it did not place Jackson in the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12771 - 2012-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
be resentenced because at sentencing, “there [wa]s no discussion on the record that the entire basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
be resentenced because at sentencing, “there [wa]s no discussion on the record that the entire basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
who [Arrington wa]s.” It began its remarks by expressing its familiarity with the case generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
who [Arrington wa]s.” It began its remarks by expressing its familiarity with the case generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. The trial court explained that “[t]he problem [wa]sn’t just what [Lay] did in July. Of course, that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28408 - 2007-03-12
. The trial court explained that “[t]he problem [wa]sn’t just what [Lay] did in July. Of course, that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28408 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argued that he should be resentenced because at sentencing, “there [wa]s no discussion on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
argued that he should be resentenced because at sentencing, “there [wa]s no discussion on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and this court’s independent review of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15
, and this court’s independent review of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is evidence of its excessiveness. We disagree. The trial court explained that “[t]he problem [wa]sn’t just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28408 - 2014-09-15
is evidence of its excessiveness. We disagree. The trial court explained that “[t]he problem [wa]sn’t just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28408 - 2014-09-15