Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 211 - 220 of 12891 for prosecuting.
Search results 211 - 220 of 12891 for prosecuting.
State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
the criminal complaint. Haines asserted in his motion that the prosecution was time-barred and violated the ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3966 - 2005-03-31
the criminal complaint. Haines asserted in his motion that the prosecution was time-barred and violated the ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
. Haines’s motion to dismiss the criminal complaint. Haines asserted in his motion that the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3966 - 2017-09-20
. Haines’s motion to dismiss the criminal complaint. Haines asserted in his motion that the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3966 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
prosecuted [and] convicted … if exculpatory [DNA] testing results had been available before the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
prosecuted [and] convicted … if exculpatory [DNA] testing results had been available before the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31934 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not have been prosecuted [and] convicted … if exculpatory [DNA] testing results had been available before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31934 - 2008-02-25
not have been prosecuted [and] convicted … if exculpatory [DNA] testing results had been available before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31934 - 2008-02-25
State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J. "[I]t is one thing to revive a prosecution already
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J. "[I]t is one thing to revive a prosecution already
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John E. Stephens
to appeal from a non-final order denying his motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution for armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9457 - 2017-09-19
to appeal from a non-final order denying his motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution for armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9457 - 2017-09-19
State v. John E. Stephens
. Stephens leave to appeal from a non-final order denying his motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
. Stephens leave to appeal from a non-final order denying his motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
Certification
the judge or the jury decides if the statute of limitations bars prosecution where the State argues
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20
the judge or the jury decides if the statute of limitations bars prosecution where the State argues
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1379-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF19
of limitations bars prosecution where the State argues that the statute
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30956 - 2014-09-15
of limitations bars prosecution where the State argues that the statute
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30956 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct, after Geurts successfully fulfilled his obligations under a deferred prosecution agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131221 - 2017-09-21
conduct, after Geurts successfully fulfilled his obligations under a deferred prosecution agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131221 - 2017-09-21