Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 211 - 220 of 59549 for quit claim deed.
Search results 211 - 220 of 59549 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
WI 48
with the Dane County Register of Deeds on March 18, 1983. ¶7 When the Nation filed claims with the DOR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15
with the Dane County Register of Deeds on March 18, 1983. ¶7 When the Nation filed claims with the DOR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
claim for a tax refund under Wis. Stat. § 139.323(3) (2005-06).[2] The statute authorizes partial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
claim for a tax refund under Wis. Stat. § 139.323(3) (2005-06).[2] The statute authorizes partial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
Jackson County v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
and determination. The issue we certify is whether a county, after taking a tax deed to assume ownership
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19930 - 2005-10-12
and determination. The issue we certify is whether a county, after taking a tax deed to assume ownership
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19930 - 2005-10-12
[PDF]
Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman
the statute of frauds. They further claimed that there was no mistake and, accordingly, the deed could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15937 - 2017-09-21
the statute of frauds. They further claimed that there was no mistake and, accordingly, the deed could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15937 - 2017-09-21
Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman
." The court also decided that the deed was ambiguous as a whole because it claimed to be in satisfaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15937 - 2005-03-31
." The court also decided that the deed was ambiguous as a whole because it claimed to be in satisfaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15937 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ordered to execute quit claim deeds to remove Ocheretner’s name from the titles to the properties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074676 - 2026-02-10
was ordered to execute quit claim deeds to remove Ocheretner’s name from the titles to the properties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074676 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was ordered to execute quit claim deeds to remove Ocheretner’s name from the titles to the properties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074676 - 2026-02-10
was ordered to execute quit claim deeds to remove Ocheretner’s name from the titles to the properties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074676 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by quit claim deed from the condominium’s original developer. In 2014, Highlands attempted to levy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186260 - 2017-09-21
by quit claim deed from the condominium’s original developer. In 2014, Highlands attempted to levy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the conveyance of its interests in the Elkhorn Property by Quit Claim Deed …. .... Spitzer accepts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123596 - 2017-09-21
and the conveyance of its interests in the Elkhorn Property by Quit Claim Deed …. .... Spitzer accepts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123596 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard E. Carter v. Audrey B. Schram
, claims that he was entitled to an easement running with an adjacent lot in perpetuity. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11487 - 2017-09-19
, claims that he was entitled to an easement running with an adjacent lot in perpetuity. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11487 - 2017-09-19