Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 211 - 220 of 84045 for simple case search.
Search results 211 - 220 of 84045 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Esteban Martinez
of this case clearly show that the warrantless probation search conducted by Kuehn was justified. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8270 - 2017-09-19
of this case clearly show that the warrantless probation search conducted by Kuehn was justified. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8270 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Esteban Martinez
of this case clearly show that the warrantless probation search conducted by Kuehn was justified. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8271 - 2017-09-19
of this case clearly show that the warrantless probation search conducted by Kuehn was justified. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8271 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
prohibits 'unreasonable searches,' and our cases establish that the taking of a blood sample
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27
prohibits 'unreasonable searches,' and our cases establish that the taking of a blood sample
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27
Linda L. Koziara v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
.” Section 102.23(6). “The court may, however, set aside the commission’s order or award and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5251 - 2005-03-31
.” Section 102.23(6). “The court may, however, set aside the commission’s order or award and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5251 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Karich
. 1 We note that the judgment of conviction in case number 94-CF-1657 appears to be erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20
. 1 We note that the judgment of conviction in case number 94-CF-1657 appears to be erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20
State v. David Karich
that he misunderstood the plea bargain. However, in reviewing a finding of fact we search for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
that he misunderstood the plea bargain. However, in reviewing a finding of fact we search for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of facts that the defendants “stipulated in this case that there was no contributory negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39993 - 2014-09-15
of facts that the defendants “stipulated in this case that there was no contributory negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39993 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury logically find no negligence? I think they could for the simple reason that they’re saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
a jury logically find no negligence? I think they could for the simple reason that they’re saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
Samuel Bonanno v. Lewis Borsellino
that the access strip was owned in fee simple by Borsellino, but was subject to a permanent easement and right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8762 - 2017-09-19
that the access strip was owned in fee simple by Borsellino, but was subject to a permanent easement and right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8762 - 2017-09-19
Samuel Bonanno v. Lewis Borsellino
judgment, the trial court found that the access strip was owned in fee simple by Borsellino
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8762 - 2008-11-30
judgment, the trial court found that the access strip was owned in fee simple by Borsellino
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8762 - 2008-11-30