Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 69130 for as he.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 69130 for as he.
[PDF]
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19
2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul G. Fassbender
not completed his sentence. Fassbender argues that, after he was sentenced, he served a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7010 - 2017-09-20
not completed his sentence. Fassbender argues that, after he was sentenced, he served a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7010 - 2017-09-20
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
Gordon Graham v. Linda Gerry
during which he was unemployed. He challenges the trial court’s determination that he voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15387 - 2005-03-31
during which he was unemployed. He challenges the trial court’s determination that he voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15387 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] He contends that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea and that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58005 - 2010-12-20
] He contends that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea and that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58005 - 2010-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, Wis. Stat. § 301.45 (2009-10).[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86725 - 2012-09-04
, Wis. Stat. § 301.45 (2009-10).[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86725 - 2012-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Washburn County failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he continues to meet the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980091 - 2025-07-08
that Washburn County failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he continues to meet the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980091 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
-degree recklessly endangering safety as a repeat offender. He also appeals the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46351 - 2014-09-15
-degree recklessly endangering safety as a repeat offender. He also appeals the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46351 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
offender. He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Phiffer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46351 - 2010-01-27
offender. He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Phiffer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46351 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. Voeller argues that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his plea was not entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
postconviction motion. Voeller argues that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his plea was not entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02