Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 82322 for case code.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 82322 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
requirement of Wis. Adm. Code Adm 10.08(6) (Dec. 2006),[2] and that the evaluation committee acted arbitrarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32921 - 2008-06-10
requirement of Wis. Adm. Code Adm 10.08(6) (Dec. 2006),[2] and that the evaluation committee acted arbitrarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32921 - 2008-06-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
proposer, UWM violated the notice requirement of WIS. ADM. CODE Adm 10.08(6) (Dec. 2006),2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
proposer, UWM violated the notice requirement of WIS. ADM. CODE Adm 10.08(6) (Dec. 2006),2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 20
2018 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2017AP320-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208217 - 2018-04-09
2018 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2017AP320-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208217 - 2018-04-09
State v. David G. Alexander
the results of that test. Wis. Adm. Code § Trans. 311.04 provides: Approval of breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
the results of that test. Wis. Adm. Code § Trans. 311.04 provides: Approval of breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142793 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142793 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Perkins’ base rate of pay. In either case, the jury found Perkins was not entitled to any additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45328 - 2014-09-15
and Perkins’ base rate of pay. In either case, the jury found Perkins was not entitled to any additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45328 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Perkins next claims the trial court erred by failing to take judicial notice of Wis. Admin. Code § 272.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
Perkins next claims the trial court erred by failing to take judicial notice of Wis. Admin. Code § 272.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS
that restricted piers to 100 feet in length from the shoreline. City of Lake Geneva Municipal Code § 90-142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2012-07-24
that restricted piers to 100 feet in length from the shoreline. City of Lake Geneva Municipal Code § 90-142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2012-07-24
Wisconsin Court System - State Law Library - Contact the Reference Desk
, including area code, in case we need more information or have technical problems replying to your email
/courts/offices/wsllcontact.htm - 2025-12-17
, including area code, in case we need more information or have technical problems replying to your email
/courts/offices/wsllcontact.htm - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
parties to this appeal dispute whether WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 110.05 applies to this transaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21
parties to this appeal dispute whether WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 110.05 applies to this transaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21