Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 6244 for cf.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 6244 for cf.
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
assessed was no greater or lesser than usual. Cf. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 686
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
assessed was no greater or lesser than usual. Cf. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 686
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
when the evidence is sufficient to do so. Cf. State v. Annala, 168 Wis.2d 453, 472, 484 N.W.2d 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10165 - 2005-03-31
when the evidence is sufficient to do so. Cf. State v. Annala, 168 Wis.2d 453, 472, 484 N.W.2d 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10165 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Milam v. Department of Natural Resources
on the project’s purpose, not just the affected portions of the wetland lots. Cf. Zealy v. City of Waukesha, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14099 - 2014-09-15
on the project’s purpose, not just the affected portions of the wetland lots. Cf. Zealy v. City of Waukesha, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14099 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2762 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CV4313
the reasonable needs of the public for an adequate supply of electric energy”); cf. WIS. STAT. § 196.49(3
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74289 - 2014-09-15
the reasonable needs of the public for an adequate supply of electric energy”); cf. WIS. STAT. § 196.49(3
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74289 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. No. 03-2295 6 these different terms in the same policy sentence. Cf. Dieter v. Chrysler Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6809 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-2295 6 these different terms in the same policy sentence. Cf. Dieter v. Chrysler Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6809 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is in the best interest of the child. Cf. Paige K.B. by Peterson v. Molepske, 219 Wis. 2d 418, 434, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99716 - 2014-09-15
is in the best interest of the child. Cf. Paige K.B. by Peterson v. Molepske, 219 Wis. 2d 418, 434, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99716 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
), small claims (SC), family (FA), paternity (PA), criminal (CF, CM, and CT), traffic (TR), and ordinance
/ecourts/efilecircuit/eupdates/eupdate10.htm - 2025-12-19
), small claims (SC), family (FA), paternity (PA), criminal (CF, CM, and CT), traffic (TR), and ordinance
/ecourts/efilecircuit/eupdates/eupdate10.htm - 2025-12-19
Lori Kaiser v. Village of Hartland
of the parties to the appeal argues that there are disputed facts which would preclude summary judgment. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14473 - 2005-03-31
of the parties to the appeal argues that there are disputed facts which would preclude summary judgment. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14473 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cory D. Wood
a person could make under these circumstances. Cf. Kiper, 193 Wis.2d at 89-90, 532 N.W.2d at 707-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9753 - 2005-03-31
a person could make under these circumstances. Cf. Kiper, 193 Wis.2d at 89-90, 532 N.W.2d at 707-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9753 - 2005-03-31
Donna Walag v. Town of Randall
the particular petition, see § 66.014(8). Cf. Nielsen, 178 Wis.2d at 514-18, 504 N.W.2d at 627-28; Certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11576 - 2005-03-31
the particular petition, see § 66.014(8). Cf. Nielsen, 178 Wis.2d at 514-18, 504 N.W.2d at 627-28; Certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11576 - 2005-03-31