Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 29827 for des.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 29827 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and review the grant or denial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102237 - 2013-10-22
of a summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and review the grant or denial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102237 - 2013-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶¶12, 13, 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶7 A police officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶7 A police officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
State v. Antonio Q. Cruz
, this court’s review is de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180, 190-91, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2005-03-31
, this court’s review is de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180, 190-91, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
review issues of constitutional fact de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
review issues of constitutional fact de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
660, 664 (1979) (quoted source omitted). We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29562 - 2014-09-15
660, 664 (1979) (quoted source omitted). We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29562 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
Clyde Sukanen v. School District of Monroe
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4415 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45665 - 2014-09-15
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45665 - 2014-09-15